The System Justification Conundrum: Re-Examining the Cognitive Dissonance Basis for System Justification
نویسندگان
چکیده
In a landmark 1994 publication in the British Journal of Social Psychology, Jost and Banaji proposed the existence of a novel, fundamental system justification motive that drives social behaviors. More specifically, they proposed (a) that people have an epistemic need to support social hierarchies and societal systems, (b) that this system justification motive is inversely related to personal and group interests among members of low status groups, and (c) that it is stronger and more effective for people who are disadvantaged by societal systems than for those who are advantaged by them, especially when personal and group interests are weak. This system justification theory (SJT) has faced theoretical opposition from social identity researchers (e.g., Spears et al., 2001; Reicher, 2004; Rubin and Hewstone, 2004). In addition, evidence against the theory has recently accumulated from large scale cross-national studies (e.g., Brandt, 2013; Kelemen et al., 2014) and experimental studies (Trump and White, 2015; Owuamalam et al., 2016). In the present article, we re-examine the key cognitive dissonance assumptions for SJT’s central proposition that support for unequal systems should be higher among members of disadvantaged groups than among members of advantaged groups when personal and group interests are weak.
منابع مشابه
I-22: The Process for Justification of ARTs in Iran Health System: Ethical and Legal Trends
-
متن کاملCognitive Dissonance in Negotiation 1 Running Head: COGNITIVE DISSONANCE IN NEGOTIATION Cognitive dissonance in negotiation: Free choice or counter-attitudinal justification?
Previous research suggests that negotiators inflate their valuation for offers they make and devalue offers they choose not to make due to the psychological process of cognitive dissonance reduction. Research outside of the negotiation context suggests that cognitive dissonance is induced either by being forced to choose among relatively equal options or by having to justify a counterattitudina...
متن کاملReducing Cognitive Dissonance Through Effort Justification: Evidence From Past Studies and Daily Experience
متن کامل
A method of identifying suitable manufacturing system (Cellular) for automotive sector using Analytical Hierarchy Process
Manufacturing produces real wealth for any country and constitutes the back bone for the service sector. The objective of any organization is to earn profit. Usually the market fixes the selling price of the manufactured components. Unless there is focus on the manufacturing strategy of reducing manufacturing cost, it is very difficult to sustain in this ever competitive world. A suitable manuf...
متن کاملChoice-induced preference: A challenge for contrast Commentary on Zentall on Cognitive Dissonance
In his target article, Zentall asks: “to experience cognitive dissonance is it necessary for one to have conflicting beliefs or even beliefs at all?” He then argues that a simple behavioral process, the Within Trial Contrast Effect, may be sufficient to explain observed cognitive dissonance effects in nonhuman animals and possibly humans as well. We agree with Zentall that this effect is suffic...
متن کامل